FlarePath
Cases › WPR10IA135 · Part 121 airline

EMBRAER EMB-120ERSKYWEST AIRLINES INC

Los Angeles, CA, USA · 2010-02-16·N226SW

0
fatal
0
serious
No injury
highest injury
Minor
damage

What happened

NTSB summary, verbatim

At the completion of a scheduled passenger flight, the airplane was taxied to the arrival gate at which point the flight crew was marshaled into the gate by a ground marshaller. The captain reported that as he taxied into the gate area at a normal speed, he observed the lead-in line, a parked fuel truck on the right side, the jet bridge on the left side, and the marshaller. He felt confident the airplane could proceed to the gate and clear all of the obstacles. As he continued to taxi, he anticipated the marshaller shortly giving the stop signal and chose to maintain visual attention on the marshaller. Just as the marshaller raised his hands to perform the stop signal, the left propeller struck the jet bridge. The first officer reported that he was looking out the right side of the airplane to make sure everything was clear of the wing and propeller. He reported that he never saw the jet bridge on the left side. He turned his attention back to the marshaller and saw his arms moving up indicating they were close to stopping. Before the marshaller crossed his day wands to indicate the stop location, the first officer felt something hit the airplane. The marshaller reported that he was concentrating on the airplane’s right side where a fuel truck was parked close to the envelope line and was concerned about the truck’s proximity to the airplane. Because of where his attention was focused, he misjudged the stop line marked for EMB airplanes and instead signaled the airplane to stop on the line marked for CRJ airplanes. Just as he crossed his wands, the left engine propeller struck the jet bridge. Postaccident examination of the airplane and surrounding parking area revealed that the airplane’s nosewheel tire came to rest about 18 feet beyond the stop line marked “EMB,” at a line marked “RJ50.” A reenactment of the incident, accomplished by towing an airplane on the taxi line toward the RJ50 stop line, determined that the flight crew had a clear view of the surroundings associated with the gate, including the jet bridge, when both occupants turned to look out the left cockpit window. In addition, it was also determined that the captain would be able to see part of the left engine and propeller as the airplane approached the jet bridge just prior to the RJ50 stop line.

Photographs

1the aircraft, and what the investigators found
The aircraft before the accident
N226SW EMB.120ER Brazillia UA-Sky West YVR 18AUG05 (6852045331)
Ken Fielding · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Probable cause

the Board's determination
The flight crew’s failure to maintain clearance from the jet bridge during taxi. Contributing to the incident was the ramp marshaller's diverted attention and failure to signal the flight crew to stop at the correct position.

Occurrence sequence

1 stepsNTSB coding · CICTT taxonomy
  1. 1 · Taxi-from runway
    Ground collision
    defining event

Findings

2 causal · 0 contributing
  • CAUSE
    Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring environment — Flight crew
  • CAUSE
    Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Task monitoring/vigilance — Ground crew

Sequence of events

6 timed eventsfrom the FDR factual report · claude-sonnet-5
  1. 0554 PSTDeparturep.1
    Scheduled domestic passenger flight originated from Carlsbad, California
  2. 06:02:10 PSTFinal Approachp.4
    Plot 1 begins, covering final approach including descent from a pressure altitude of 6,800 feet through landing
  3. 06:07:50 PSTLandingp.4
    Plot 2 begins, covering final touchdown
  4. 0634 PSTTaxi/Gate Arrivalp.1
    SkyWest Airlines Embraer EMB-120ER, N226SW, taxied into a jet bridge while parking at its assigned terminal gate at LAX
  5. 06:14:43 PSTTaxi/Gate Arrivalp.4
    Event occurred approximately 6 minutes and 43 seconds after touchdown when engine 1 propeller and longitudinal acceleration parameters decreased from 49% to 0% and 0.03 g's to -0.17 g's, respectively
  6. N/APost-eventp.3
    FDR data ended about 4.5 seconds after the event, which occurred about 7 minutes after the last recorded landing

NTSB analysis

from the final report

At the completion of a scheduled passenger flight, the airplane was taxied to the arrival gate at which point the flight crew was marshaled into the gate by a ground marshaller. The captain reported that as he taxied into the gate area at a normal speed, he observed the lead-in line, a parked fuel truck on the right side, the jet bridge on the left side, and the marshaller. He felt confident the airplane could proceed to the gate and clear all of the obstacles. As he continued to taxi, he anticipated the marshaller shortly giving the stop signal and chose to maintain visual attention on the marshaller. Just as the marshaller raised his hands to perform the stop signal, the left propeller struck the jet bridge. The first officer reported that he was looking out the right side of the airplane to make sure everything was clear of the wing and propeller. He reported that he never saw the jet bridge on the left side. He turned his attention back to the marshaller and saw his arms moving up indicating they were close to stopping. Before the marshaller crossed his day wands to indicate the stop location, the first officer felt something hit the airplane. The marshaller reported that he was concentrating on the airplane’s right side where a fuel truck was parked close to the envelope line and was concerned about the truck’s proximity to the airplane. Because of where his attention was focused, he misjudged the stop line marked for EMB airplanes and instead signaled the airplane to stop on the line marked for CRJ airplanes. Just as he crossed his wands, the left engine propeller struck the jet bridge. Postaccident examination of the airplane and surrounding parking area revealed that the airplane’s nosewheel tire came to rest about 18 feet beyond the stop line marked “EMB,” at a line marked “RJ50.” A reenactment of the incident, accomplished by towing an airplane on the taxi line toward the RJ50 stop line, determined that the flight crew had a clear view of the surroundings associated with the gate, including the jet bridge, when both occupants turned to look out the left cockpit window. In addition, it was also determined that the captain would be able to see part of the left engine and propeller as the airplane approached the jet bridge just prior to the RJ50 stop line.