FlarePath
Cases › DCA22LA178 · Part 121 airline · Class 4 - Basic report with no Prelim publish

BOEING 757-251DELTA AIR LINES INC

Atlanta, GA, USA · 2022-08-07·N540US

0
fatal
0
serious
No injury
highest injury
Substantial
damage

What happened

NTSB summary, verbatim

Delta Air Lines flight 1696 sustained a tailstrike while landing at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL), Atlanta, GA. The flight was a regularly scheduled domestic passenger flight from Fort Lauderdale, FL (FLL) to ATL. The airplane sustained substantial damage, and there were no injuries to the 203 passengers and crew onboard. According to the flight crew, the captain was the pilot monitoring, and the first officer (FO) was the pilot flying. The captain reported that he was providing operational experience to the FO and that it was the FO’s first time landing the Boeing 757-200 model airplane. The airplane was in the landing configuration with flaps at 25 and on a stabilized approach at 1000 ft above ground level (AGL) on final approach to Runway 10 in night visual condition. After touchdown, the speed brakes deployed, and the FO reported that he applied too much aft pressure on the yoke causing the plane to lift back off the ground and the captain executed a “go-around” procedure. At this time the captain assumed the pilot flying role, and the airplane landed uneventfully. Both the captain and FO reported they had no indications of a tailstrike on the flight deck, they did not receive any passenger or flight attendant reports of any abnormalities and were unaware a tailstrike had occurred until the plane was inspected by maintenance later.

Photographs

1the aircraft, and what the investigators found
The aircraft before the accident
Delta Boeing 757-200 N540US BWI MD1
Acroterion · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Probable cause

the Board's determination
The overpitch control of the airplane during landing resulting in a tail strike.

Occurrence sequence

1 stepsNTSB coding · CICTT taxonomy
  1. 1 · Landing-flare/touchdown
    Tailstrike
    defining event

Findings

0 causal · 3 contributing
  • FACTOR
    Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Landing flare — Not attained/maintained
  • FACTOR
    Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control — Flight crew
  • FACTOR
    Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Identification/recognition — Flight crew

Sequence of events

2 timed eventsfrom the FDR factual report · claude-sonnet-5
  1. 21:20:45 EDTFirst landing attempt/go-aroundp.5
    During the first landing attempt and subsequent go-around at Atlanta Hartsfield Jackson International Airport (ATL), a maximum vertical acceleration of 1.231g was recorded
  2. 21:29:46 EDTLandingp.5
    Aircraft landed at ATL after going around and repositioning for another attempt

NTSB analysis

from the final report

Delta Air Lines flight 1696 sustained a tailstrike while landing at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL), Atlanta, GA. The flight was a regularly scheduled domestic passenger flight from Fort Lauderdale, FL (FLL) to ATL. The airplane sustained substantial damage, and there were no injuries to the 203 passengers and crew onboard. According to the flight crew, the captain was the pilot monitoring, and the first officer (FO) was the pilot flying. The captain reported that he was providing operational experience to the FO and that it was the FO’s first time landing the Boeing 757-200 model airplane. The airplane was in the landing configuration with flaps at 25 and on a stabilized approach at 1000 ft above ground level (AGL) on final approach to Runway 10 in night visual condition. After touchdown, the speed brakes deployed, and the FO reported that he applied too much aft pressure on the yoke causing the plane to lift back off the ground and the captain executed a “go-around” procedure. At this time the captain assumed the pilot flying role, and the airplane landed uneventfully. Both the captain and FO reported they had no indications of a tailstrike on the flight deck, they did not receive any passenger or flight attendant reports of any abnormalities and were unaware a tailstrike had occurred until the plane was inspected by maintenance later.