FlarePath
Cases › DCA17FA021 › The analyst

BOEING 767AMERICAN AIRLINES INC

What the docket says, assembled. No language model is involved, so nothing on this page can be invented — every line traces to a recorder, a report page or the Board's own record.

29
timed facts
8
precedents
32
passages to ask

Ask the docket

passages, not paraphrases
Try

Every answer is a passage of the docket with the page it came from, or the words “not in the docket”. Nothing is summarised or reasoned for you — read the source.

One timeline

29 timed factsthe recorder events from the FDR report, with the transcript's warnings, callouts, the words nearest each event and the final seconds — on one clock, as printed in each report
  1. 14:22:15FDRPre-flight/Groundp.3
    Recording began with APU and left engine running
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  2. 14:22:20FDRGround/Engine Startp.3
    Right engine start sequence began with N2 rotation
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  3. 14:22:45FDRGround/Engine Startp.3
    Fuel switch moved from cutoff position
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  4. 14:23:20FDRTaxip.3
    Autobrakes selected in RTO (rejected takeoff) position
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  5. 14:23:20FDRTaxip.3
    APU was shut down (remained off for remainder of recording)
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  6. 14:30:29.4CVR STARTfinal secondsp.8
    “OF TRANSCRIPT 14:30:29.4 American three eighty three heavy runway two eight right at”
    read in context ↗
  7. 14:30:29.4CVR TWRfinal secondsp.8
    “november five line up and wait. winds two zero zero at one four.”
    read in context ↗
  8. 14:30:46.6CVR TWRfinal secondsp.9
    “runway two eight right at november five cleared for takeoff.”
    read in context ↗
  9. 14:31:00.5CVR RDO-2final secondsp.9
    “three heavy.”
    read in context ↗
  10. 14:31:20FDRTakeoff rollp.3
    Takeoff attempt began; throttles advanced and engines accelerated to high power
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  11. 14:31:43.4FDRTakeoff rollp.4
    Accel changes indicative of #2 engine failure
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  12. 14:31:44.7FDRRejected takeoffp.4
    Throttles reduced to idle
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  13. 14:31:45.7FDRRejected takeoffp.4
    RTO autobrakes activated
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  14. 14:31:45.9FDRRejected takeoffp.4
    Peak recorded speeds
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  15. 14:31:47.5FDRRejected takeoffp.4
    Auto speedbrakes activated
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  16. 14:31:48.6FDRRejected takeoffp.4
    Peak deceleration achieved
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  17. 14:32:00FDRRejected takeoffp.4
    ENG FIRE R message activated
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  18. 14:32:00.5FDRRejected takeoffp.4
    Manual braking initiated
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  19. 14:32:08FDRRejected takeoffp.4
    #2 engine fuel control moved to Cutoff
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  20. 14:32:09.8FDRStopped on runwayp.4
    Aircraft came to a stop
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  21. 14:32:12FDRStopped on runwayp.4
    #2 engine fire extinguisher activated
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  22. 14:32:15.6CVR TWRfinal secondsp.11
    “now?”
    read in context ↗
  23. 14:32:16FDRStopped on runwayp.4
    Parking brake set
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  24. 14:32:20FDREvacuationp.4
    Left overwing exit door opened
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  25. 14:32:38FDREvacuationp.4
    Forward left entry door opened
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  26. 14:32:42FDREvacuationp.4
    Forward right entry door opened
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  27. 14:32:48FDREvacuationp.4
    Aft left entry door opened
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  28. 14:33:08.9FDRPost-evacuationp.4
    End of recording, #1 engine shut down
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  29. 14:33:09.7CVR PAfinal secondsp.15
    “evac this is the captain— HOT-2”
    read in context ↗
FLIGHT DATA RECORDER SPECIALIST'S FACTUAL REPORT · 23 events extracted by claude-sonnet-5COCKPIT VOICE RECORDER - GROUP CHAIRMAN'S FACTUAL REPORT · 6 of 6 lines shown
How the Board coded the sequence
  1. Takeoff-rejected takeoff: Uncontained engine failure→
  2. Other: Fire/smoke (non-impact)→
  3. Other: Evacuation

Precedents

8 closest casesranked by what happened, in the Board's words, and by the findings and occurrences it coded
  • ENG11IA0352011-06-21no fatalitiesmatch 60
    BOEING 757-232 · DELTA AIR LINES INC
    Atlanta, GA
    • ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
    • ●Organizational issues › Development › Design
    Fire/smoke (non-impact)
  • ENG14IA0282014-09-18no fatalitiesmatch 57
    AIRBUS A320 232 · jetBlue Airways
    Long Beach, CA
    • ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
    • ●Organizational issues › Development › Manufacture/production
    Fire/smoke (non-impact)
  • WPR13IA1442013-03-05no fatalitiesmatch 57
    BOMBARDIER DHC-8-402 · Horizon Air
    Danville, CA
    • ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
    • ●Organizational issues › Development › Manufacture/production
    Fire/smoke (non-impact)
  • DCA21FA1742021-07-02destroyedmatch 57
    BOEING 737-275C · RHOADES AVIATION INC
    Honolulu, HI
    • ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
    • ●Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action
    • ●Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel)
  • ENG12IA0032011-10-23no fatalitiesmatch 57
    BOEING 747-451 · DELTA AIR LINES INC
    Detroit, MI
    • ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
    Uncontained engine failure
  • DCA16FA0132015-10-29substantialmatch 55
    BOEING 767 · Dynamic International
    Fort Lauderdale, FL
    • ●Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system
    Fire/smoke (non-impact)
  • DCA11IA0152010-12-29no fatalitiesmatch 54
    BOEING 757-223 · AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
    Jackson Hole, WY
    • ●Organizational issues › Development › Manufacture/production
    • ●Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action
    • ●Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info
  • CEN15MA2902015-07-031 fatalmatch 53
    AIRBUS HELICOPTERS INC AS350B3E · AIR METHODS CORP
    Frisco, CO
    • ●Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system
    • ●Organizational issues › Development › Design
    • ●Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action
    • +1 more shared findings

What the record says

a pattern, not a findingacross the 8 closest cases · 8 carry coded findings · 8 have a probable cause
Findings the Board cited in those cases
Occurrences it coded
  • 4 of 8Fire/smoke (non-impact)
  • 2 of 8Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail
  • 2 of 8Loss of engine power (partial)
Set against the Board’s own findings for this case
Cited here, and common in the precedents
  • Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
  • Aircraft systems › Fuel system
  • Development › Design
  • Development › Manufacture/production
  • Action/decision › Action
  • Task performance › Use of equip/info
Cited here, not seen in the precedents
  • —
Common in the precedents, not cited here
  • Action/decision › Info processing/decision

A teaching device, not a verdict: what the record would have looked at, next to what the Board found.

In the Board’s words — the closest cases
  • ENG11IA0352011-06-21 · BOEING 757-232 · DELTA AIR LINES INC
    Fuel leaking from the fuel flow transmitter that ignited on contact with the engine’s hot cases which resulted in an engine undercowl fire. The fuel leak resulted from the fuel flow transmitter end housing backing off from the main housing, creating a gap that allowed high pressure fuel to escape. Under certain assembly variances and operational load and temperature variations, the end housing joint may not be able to maintain the preload without eventually yielding, which results in the loosening of the joint and…
  • ENG14IA0282014-09-18 · AIRBUS A320 232 · jetBlue Airways
    The probable cause of the engine failure and subsequent undercowl engine fire was due to the fatigue fracture of a high pressure turbine stage 2 disk blade retaining lug that released two blades which impacted the low pressure turbine case causing a fuel line to fracture spraying fuel on the hot engine cases where it ignited. During a machining operation of the disk lug, a tool mark was introduced that set up the area for fatigue cracks to initiate.
  • WPR13IA1442013-03-05 · BOMBARDIER DHC-8-402 · Horizon Air
    The failure and separation of a section of the No. 2 engine's combustion chamber's small exit duct (SED), which created an airflow disruption that led to an engine surge and subsequent fire. Contributing to the accident was the insufficient weld penetration that remained totally contained within the SED outer dome and did not penetrate through to the inner duct as required by the manufacturing specifications.
  • DCA21FA1742021-07-02 · BOEING 737-275C · RHOADES AVIATION INC
    The flight crewmembers’ misidentification of the damaged engine (after leveling off the airplane and reducing thrust) and their use of only the damaged engine for thrust during the remainder of the flight, resulting in an unintentional descent and forced ditching in the Pacific Ocean. Contributing to the accident were the flight crew’s ineffective crew resource management, high workload, and stress.
  • ENG12IA0032011-10-23 · BOEING 747-451 · DELTA AIR LINES INC
    The penetration of turbine blade fragments through the rear turbine case, which punctured the No. 4 bearing oil pressure supply tube, allowing misted oil to contact the hot engine case and ignite the undercowl fire. Contributing to the incident was the installation of approved (but not preferred) stage 3 low pressure turbine outer transition duct segments with the riveted rear seal configuration and the failure of the engine design to comply with the engine debris containment requirements of 14 Code of Federal R…
What it recommended after them
  • A-12-044TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: Require all operators of existing speedbrake-equipped transport-category airplanes to develop and incorporate training to specifically address recognition of a situation in which the speedbrakes do no… · DCA11IA015Closed - Acceptable Action
  • A-12-045TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: Require all newly type-certificated 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 25 airplanes to have a clearly distinguishable and intelligible alert that warns pilots when the speedbrakes have not deployed d… · DCA11IA015Open Acceptable Alternate Response
  • A-12-046TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: Require Boeing to establish guidance for pilots of all relevant airplanes to follow when an unintended thrust reverser lockout occurs and to provide that guidance to all operators of those airplanes. · DCA11IA015Closed - Reconsidered
  • A-17-008TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: Require that existing Airbus Helicopters dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters be equipped with a visual and an aural alert for the loss of hydraulic boost to the pedal controls, which would result… · CEN15MA290Closed - Unacceptable Action
  • A-17-009TO AIRBUS HELICOPTERS: For newly manufactured dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters, assess and implement changes to the dual hydraulic system that would both ensure pedal control hydraulic assistance and mitigate the possibility of pilot… · CEN15MA290Closed - Acceptable Action
  • A-17-010TO AIRBUS HELICOPTERS: For existing dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters, assess and implement changes to the dual hydraulic system that would both ensure pedal control hydraulic assistance and mitigate the possibility of pilot error dur… · CEN15MA290Closed - Acceptable Action
  • A-17-011TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AND THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY: After the actions requested in Safety Recommendation A-17-10 are completed, require operators of Airbus Helicopters dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters to i… · CEN15MA290Open - Unacceptable Response
  • A-17-012TO THE ASSOCIATION OF CRITICAL CARE TRANSPORT: In collaboration with the Association of Air Medical Services and the Air Medical Operators Association, establish a working group to develop and distribute guidelines, for those who purchase,… · CEN15MA290Open - Acceptable Response

This is the pattern in the NTSB’s own record across similar accidents — which findings it cited, what it coded, what it recommended. It is drawn from the record, not written about this case, and it never assigns blame: investigations exist to prevent the next accident (ICAO Annex 13).