Cases › DCA17FA021 › The analyst
BOEING 767AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
What the docket says, assembled. No language model is involved, so nothing on this page can be invented — every line traces to a recorder, a report page or the Board's own record.
29
timed facts
8
precedents
32
passages to ask
Ask the docket
passages, not paraphrasesTry
Every answer is a passage of the docket with the page it came from, or the words “not in the docket”. Nothing is summarised or reasoned for you — read the source.
One timeline
29 timed factsthe recorder events from the FDR report, with the transcript's warnings, callouts, the words nearest each event and the final seconds — on one clock, as printed in each report- 14:22:15FDRPre-flight/Groundp.3Recording began with APU and left engine runningsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:22:20FDRGround/Engine Startp.3Right engine start sequence began with N2 rotationsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:22:45FDRGround/Engine Startp.3Fuel switch moved from cutoff positionsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:23:20FDRTaxip.3Autobrakes selected in RTO (rejected takeoff) positionsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:23:20FDRTaxip.3APU was shut down (remained off for remainder of recording)see the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:30:29.4CVR STARTfinal secondsp.8“OF TRANSCRIPT 14:30:29.4 American three eighty three heavy runway two eight right at”read in context ↗
- 14:30:29.4CVR TWRfinal secondsp.8“november five line up and wait. winds two zero zero at one four.”read in context ↗
- 14:30:46.6CVR TWRfinal secondsp.9“runway two eight right at november five cleared for takeoff.”read in context ↗
- 14:31:00.5CVR RDO-2final secondsp.9“three heavy.”read in context ↗
- 14:31:20FDRTakeoff rollp.3Takeoff attempt began; throttles advanced and engines accelerated to high powersee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:31:43.4FDRTakeoff rollp.4Accel changes indicative of #2 engine failuresee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:31:44.7FDRRejected takeoffp.4Throttles reduced to idlesee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:31:45.7FDRRejected takeoffp.4RTO autobrakes activatedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:31:45.9FDRRejected takeoffp.4Peak recorded speedssee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:31:47.5FDRRejected takeoffp.4Auto speedbrakes activatedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:31:48.6FDRRejected takeoffp.4Peak deceleration achievedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:00FDRRejected takeoffp.4ENG FIRE R message activatedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:00.5FDRRejected takeoffp.4Manual braking initiatedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:08FDRRejected takeoffp.4#2 engine fuel control moved to Cutoffsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:09.8FDRStopped on runwayp.4Aircraft came to a stopsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:12FDRStopped on runwayp.4#2 engine fire extinguisher activatedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:15.6CVR TWRfinal secondsp.11“now?”read in context ↗
- 14:32:16FDRStopped on runwayp.4Parking brake setsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:20FDREvacuationp.4Left overwing exit door openedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:38FDREvacuationp.4Forward left entry door openedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:42FDREvacuationp.4Forward right entry door openedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:32:48FDREvacuationp.4Aft left entry door openedsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:33:08.9FDRPost-evacuationp.4End of recording, #1 engine shut downsee the traces at this moment ↗
- 14:33:09.7CVR PAfinal secondsp.15“evac this is the captain— HOT-2”read in context ↗
FLIGHT DATA RECORDER SPECIALIST'S FACTUAL REPORT · 23 events extracted by claude-sonnet-5COCKPIT VOICE RECORDER - GROUP CHAIRMAN'S FACTUAL REPORT · 6 of 6 lines shown
How the Board coded the sequence
- Takeoff-rejected takeoff: Uncontained engine failure→
- Other: Fire/smoke (non-impact)→
- Other: Evacuation
Precedents
8 closest casesranked by what happened, in the Board's words, and by the findings and occurrences it coded- BOEING 757-232 · DELTA AIR LINES INCAtlanta, GA
- ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
- ●Organizational issues › Development › Design
Fire/smoke (non-impact) - AIRBUS A320 232 · jetBlue AirwaysLong Beach, CA
- ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
- ●Organizational issues › Development › Manufacture/production
Fire/smoke (non-impact) - BOMBARDIER DHC-8-402 · Horizon AirDanville, CA
- ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
- ●Organizational issues › Development › Manufacture/production
Fire/smoke (non-impact) - BOEING 737-275C · RHOADES AVIATION INCHonolulu, HI
- ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
- ●Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action
- ●Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel)
- BOEING 747-451 · DELTA AIR LINES INCDetroit, MI
- ●Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
Uncontained engine failure - BOEING 767 · Dynamic InternationalFort Lauderdale, FL
- ●Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system
Fire/smoke (non-impact) - BOEING 757-223 · AMERICAN AIRLINES INCJackson Hole, WY
- ●Organizational issues › Development › Manufacture/production
- ●Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action
- ●Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info
- AIRBUS HELICOPTERS INC AS350B3E · AIR METHODS CORPFrisco, CO
- ●Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system
- ●Organizational issues › Development › Design
- ●Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action
- +1 more shared findings
What the record says
a pattern, not a findingacross the 8 closest cases · 8 carry coded findings · 8 have a probable causeFindings the Board cited in those cases
- 5 of 8Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)cited here too
- 3 of 8Organizational issues › Development › Manufacture/productioncited here too
- 3 of 8Personnel issues › Action/decision › Actioncited here too
- 2 of 8Organizational issues › Development › Designcited here too
- 2 of 8Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision
- 2 of 8Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel systemcited here too
- 2 of 8Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/infocited here too
Occurrences it coded
- 4 of 8Fire/smoke (non-impact)
- 2 of 8Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail
- 2 of 8Loss of engine power (partial)
Set against the Board’s own findings for this case
Cited here, and common in the precedents
- Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop)
- Aircraft systems › Fuel system
- Development › Design
- Development › Manufacture/production
- Action/decision › Action
- Task performance › Use of equip/info
Cited here, not seen in the precedents
- —
Common in the precedents, not cited here
- Action/decision › Info processing/decision
A teaching device, not a verdict: what the record would have looked at, next to what the Board found.
In the Board’s words — the closest cases
- ENG11IA0352011-06-21 · BOEING 757-232 · DELTA AIR LINES INC
Fuel leaking from the fuel flow transmitter that ignited on contact with the engine’s hot cases which resulted in an engine undercowl fire. The fuel leak resulted from the fuel flow transmitter end housing backing off from the main housing, creating a gap that allowed high pressure fuel to escape. Under certain assembly variances and operational load and temperature variations, the end housing joint may not be able to maintain the preload without eventually yielding, which results in the loosening of the joint and…
- ENG14IA0282014-09-18 · AIRBUS A320 232 · jetBlue Airways
The probable cause of the engine failure and subsequent undercowl engine fire was due to the fatigue fracture of a high pressure turbine stage 2 disk blade retaining lug that released two blades which impacted the low pressure turbine case causing a fuel line to fracture spraying fuel on the hot engine cases where it ignited. During a machining operation of the disk lug, a tool mark was introduced that set up the area for fatigue cracks to initiate.
- WPR13IA1442013-03-05 · BOMBARDIER DHC-8-402 · Horizon Air
The failure and separation of a section of the No. 2 engine's combustion chamber's small exit duct (SED), which created an airflow disruption that led to an engine surge and subsequent fire. Contributing to the accident was the insufficient weld penetration that remained totally contained within the SED outer dome and did not penetrate through to the inner duct as required by the manufacturing specifications.
- DCA21FA1742021-07-02 · BOEING 737-275C · RHOADES AVIATION INC
The flight crewmembers’ misidentification of the damaged engine (after leveling off the airplane and reducing thrust) and their use of only the damaged engine for thrust during the remainder of the flight, resulting in an unintentional descent and forced ditching in the Pacific Ocean. Contributing to the accident were the flight crew’s ineffective crew resource management, high workload, and stress.
- ENG12IA0032011-10-23 · BOEING 747-451 · DELTA AIR LINES INC
The penetration of turbine blade fragments through the rear turbine case, which punctured the No. 4 bearing oil pressure supply tube, allowing misted oil to contact the hot engine case and ignite the undercowl fire. Contributing to the incident was the installation of approved (but not preferred) stage 3 low pressure turbine outer transition duct segments with the riveted rear seal configuration and the failure of the engine design to comply with the engine debris containment requirements of 14 Code of Federal R…
What it recommended after them
- A-12-044TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: Require all operators of existing speedbrake-equipped transport-category airplanes to develop and incorporate training to specifically address recognition of a situation in which the speedbrakes do no… · DCA11IA015Closed - Acceptable Action
- A-12-045TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: Require all newly type-certificated 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 25 airplanes to have a clearly distinguishable and intelligible alert that warns pilots when the speedbrakes have not deployed d… · DCA11IA015Open Acceptable Alternate Response
- A-12-046TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: Require Boeing to establish guidance for pilots of all relevant airplanes to follow when an unintended thrust reverser lockout occurs and to provide that guidance to all operators of those airplanes. · DCA11IA015Closed - Reconsidered
- A-17-008TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION: Require that existing Airbus Helicopters dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters be equipped with a visual and an aural alert for the loss of hydraulic boost to the pedal controls, which would result… · CEN15MA290Closed - Unacceptable Action
- A-17-009TO AIRBUS HELICOPTERS: For newly manufactured dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters, assess and implement changes to the dual hydraulic system that would both ensure pedal control hydraulic assistance and mitigate the possibility of pilot… · CEN15MA290Closed - Acceptable Action
- A-17-010TO AIRBUS HELICOPTERS: For existing dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters, assess and implement changes to the dual hydraulic system that would both ensure pedal control hydraulic assistance and mitigate the possibility of pilot error dur… · CEN15MA290Closed - Acceptable Action
- A-17-011TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AND THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY: After the actions requested in Safety Recommendation A-17-10 are completed, require operators of Airbus Helicopters dual-hydraulic AS350-series helicopters to i… · CEN15MA290Open - Unacceptable Response
- A-17-012TO THE ASSOCIATION OF CRITICAL CARE TRANSPORT: In collaboration with the Association of Air Medical Services and the Air Medical Operators Association, establish a working group to develop and distribute guidelines, for those who purchase,… · CEN15MA290Open - Acceptable Response
This is the pattern in the NTSB’s own record across similar accidents — which findings it cited, what it coded, what it recommended. It is drawn from the record, not written about this case, and it never assigns blame: investigations exist to prevent the next accident (ICAO Annex 13).