FlarePath
Cases › DCA14FA122 · Part 121 airline

BOEING 767 36NOMNI AIR INTERNATIONAL INC

Kabul, AF · 2014-06-20·N768NA

0
fatal
0
serious
Minor injury
highest injury
Substantial
damage

What happened

NTSB summary, verbatim

The flight experienced a tailstrike on landing resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and aft pressure bulkhead. There were no injuries to the passengers; however, four of the 16 crewmembers received minor injuries. According to the flight crew statements and recorder data, the landing reference speed for the approach was 145 knots.  Due to the weather conditions, the flight crew added 10 knots to this for their approach speed due to the gusty weather conditions and conducted a visual approach using the visual approach slope indicator as guidance. As a result of the weather and gusty winds, airspeed fluctuated during the approach between 162 knots and 138 knots and engine thrust varied accordingly between about 86% N1 and 40% N1 on approach. The captain stated that the flight was on speed and glide path at 500 feet above the ground but at about 200 feet above the ground, the flight started to move above the glide path and airspeed started to increase. To compensate, the captain reduced engine power and then heard a "sink rate" aural alert when passing through about 50 feet. Flight recorder data indicated the engine N1 decreased to 40%, with throttles at forward idle position, at about 110 feet above the ground, and remained there until after touchdown.  The airplane touched down at 140 knots and a nose up pitch attitude of 8.9 °, increasing to 9.5° immediately after touchdown.  Guidance included in the operator's training manuals indicated that normal touchdown attitude should be between 4 and 6 degrees nose up. Additionally, guidance indicated that thrust should be managed on approach to maintain reference speed, plus any wind additive, until the beginning of the flare. After reaching the flare, thrust levers should be retarded smoothly to idle with main gear touchdown ideally occurring simultaneously with thrust levers reaching idle. An analysis of calculated vertical and horizontal wind effect indicated an existing updraft transitioned to a downdraft and a headwind component transitioned to a tailwind component during the last 5 seconds prior to touchdown.

Probable cause

the Board's determination
the early reduction of engine thrust that resulted in an excessive sink rate and nose high pitch attitude during the landing flare. Contributing to the accident was a significant change in the vertical and horizontal wind components just prior to touchdown.

Occurrence sequence

2 stepsNTSB coding · CICTT taxonomy
  1. 1 · Landing-flare/touchdown
    Tailstrike
    defining event
  2. 2 · Landing-flare/touchdown
    Abnormal runway contact

Findings

2 causal · 0 contributing
  • CAUSE
    Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control — Pilot
  • CAUSE
    Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Sudden wind shift — Response/compensation

Sequence of events

3 timed eventsfrom the FDR factual report · claude-fable-5-1 (in-session)
  1. approachapproachp.3
    Accident approach to runway 29 at Kabul began at approximately 9,600 ft pressure altitude; Kabul airport elevation approximately 5,900 ft MSL
  2. about 3 seconds before touchdownlandingp.3
    TAWS generated a Mode 1 'Sink Rate' alert
  3. touchdown, about 1937 local (1507 UTC)landingp.3
    Tail strike during landing on runway 29; maximum pitch during landing approximately 9.5 degrees, maximum vertical acceleration approximately 2.5 g, touchdown at approximately 140 knots computed airspeed; aircraft substantially damaged, 4 of 16 crew with minor injuries

NTSB analysis

from the final report

The flight experienced a tailstrike on landing resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and aft pressure bulkhead. There were no injuries to the passengers; however, four of the 16 crewmembers received minor injuries. According to the flight crew statements and recorder data, the landing reference speed for the approach was 145 knots.  Due to the weather conditions, the flight crew added 10 knots to this for their approach speed due to the gusty weather conditions and conducted a visual approach using the visual approach slope indicator as guidance. As a result of the weather and gusty winds, airspeed fluctuated during the approach between 162 knots and 138 knots and engine thrust varied accordingly between about 86% N1 and 40% N1 on approach. The captain stated that the flight was on speed and glide path at 500 feet above the ground but at about 200 feet above the ground, the flight started to move above the glide path and airspeed started to increase. To compensate, the captain reduced engine power and then heard a "sink rate" aural alert when passing through about 50 feet. Flight recorder data indicated the engine N1 decreased to 40%, with throttles at forward idle position, at about 110 feet above the ground, and remained there until after touchdown.  The airplane touched down at 140 knots and a nose up pitch attitude of 8.9 °, increasing to 9.5° immediately after touchdown.  Guidance included in the operator's training manuals indicated that normal touchdown attitude should be between 4 and 6 degrees nose up. Additionally, guidance indicated that thrust should be managed on approach to maintain reference speed, plus any wind additive, until the beginning of the flare. After reaching the flare, thrust levers should be retarded smoothly to idle with main gear touchdown ideally occurring simultaneously with thrust levers reaching idle. An analysis of calculated vertical and horizontal wind effect indicated an existing updraft transitioned to a downdraft and a headwind component transitioned to a tailwind component during the last 5 seconds prior to touchdown.