FlarePath
Cases › DCA11FA091 · Part 121 airline

BOEING 747-422United Airlines

Tangshan, CN · 2011-07-29·N173UA

0
fatal
1
serious
Serious injury
highest injury
—
damage

What happened

NTSB summary, verbatim

The flight crew reported a normal takeoff and climbout with a small amount of clouds and rain in the area. The preflight weather briefing package included a forecast of convective activity including a SIGMET (significant meteorological information) for thunderstorms south of the Beijing area moving northeastward. The crew was aware of the potential for convective activity during the climbout from Beijing, and the initial enroute segment over the Bohai Sea. During flight, the Captain was actively using the airborne weather radar to search for convective returns, including using the Doppler functions. Satellite imagery showed a signature termed “transverse banding” which is indicative of thunderstorms and turbulence at altitude. Based on the lack of weather radar returns, the Captain kept the cabin seat belt sign illuminated, but advised the cabin crew that they could begin service. The airplane encountered convectively induced turbulence, resulting in a peak vertical acceleration of over 2 G’s. The activity was likely developing upwards into the flight path, and precipitation attenuation and/or radar over-scanning may have contributed to the lack of visibility of the condition, which led to the risk assessment to allow the flight attendants to begin service. Following the turbulence encounter, the flight crew controlled the airplane appropriately to avoid an overspeed or other hazardous condition. The flight and cabin crew consulted with a physician passenger and determined continuing the flight per the injured flight attendant’s desire, was appropriate.

Photographs

1the aircraft, and what the investigators found
The aircraft before the accident
209aa - United Airlines Boeing 747-400, N173UA@SFO,26.02.2003 - Flickr - Aero Icarus
Aero Icarus from Zürich, Switzerland · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Probable cause

the Board's determination
an inadvertent encounter with convectively induced turbulence likely due to radar limitations and convective weather developing upwards into the flight path.

Occurrence sequence

1 stepsNTSB coding · CICTT taxonomy
  1. 1 · Enroute-climb to cruise
    Turbulence encounter
    defining event

Findings

1 causal · 0 contributing
  • CAUSE
    Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › Convective turbulence — Awareness of condition

NTSB analysis

from the final report

The flight crew reported a normal takeoff and climbout with a small amount of clouds and rain in the area. The preflight weather briefing package included a forecast of convective activity including a SIGMET (significant meteorological information) for thunderstorms south of the Beijing area moving northeastward. The crew was aware of the potential for convective activity during the climbout from Beijing, and the initial enroute segment over the Bohai Sea. During flight, the Captain was actively using the airborne weather radar to search for convective returns, including using the Doppler functions. Satellite imagery showed a signature termed “transverse banding” which is indicative of thunderstorms and turbulence at altitude. Based on the lack of weather radar returns, the Captain kept the cabin seat belt sign illuminated, but advised the cabin crew that they could begin service. The airplane encountered convectively induced turbulence, resulting in a peak vertical acceleration of over 2 G’s. The activity was likely developing upwards into the flight path, and precipitation attenuation and/or radar over-scanning may have contributed to the lack of visibility of the condition, which led to the risk assessment to allow the flight attendants to begin service. Following the turbulence encounter, the flight crew controlled the airplane appropriately to avoid an overspeed or other hazardous condition. The flight and cabin crew consulted with a physician passenger and determined continuing the flight per the injured flight attendant’s desire, was appropriate.