BOEING 757-222UNITED AIRlNES INC
What the docket says, assembled. No language model is involved, so nothing on this page can be invented — every line traces to a recorder, a report page or the Board's own record.
Ask the docket
passages, not paraphrasesEvery answer is a passage of the docket with the page it came from, or the words “not in the docket”. Nothing is summarised or reasoned for you — read the source.
One timeline
0 timed factsthe recorder events from the FDR report, with the transcript's warnings, callouts, the words nearest each event and the final seconds — on one clock, as printed in each reportNo timed facts: this docket has no extracted recorder sequence and no transcript.
- 1637:01Aircraft air/ground mode switched to ground
- 1637:34Heading change from about 348 degrees to 319 degrees, occurring 33 seconds after air/ground switch to ground
- after 1638:13The airspeeds recorded after this time are not reliable
- shortly after thrust reverser deploymentA split in N1 and N2
- coincident with thrust reverser deploymentIncrease in fuel flow, followed by number 1 engine fuel flow indicating zero along with a decrease in oil pressure
- during the landingThe left Shutoff Valve shows a change of state from open to closed
- Landing-landing roll: Birdstrike
Precedents
8 closest casesranked by what happened, in the Board's words, and by the findings and occurrences it coded- BOEING 737 3H4 · SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COSt. Louis, MO
- ●Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance
Birdstrike - MCDONNELL DOUGLAS MD-90-30 · DELTA AIR LINES INCPhoenix, AZ
- ●Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance
Birdstrike - BOEING 737 · SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COSt. Louis, MO
- ●Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance
Birdstrike - BOEING 737 · Southwest Airlines, Co.Baltimore, MD
- ●Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance
Birdstrike - BOEING 737-924ER · UNITED AIR LINES INCDenver, CO
- ●Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance
Birdstrike - DE HAVILLAND DHC8 - 102 · Piedmont AirlinesPhiladelphia, PA
- ●Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance
Birdstrike - EMBRAER EMB-145XR · Express Jet AirlinesSalt Lake City, UT
- ●Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance
Birdstrike - AIRBUS A320 · DELTA AIR LINES INCRed Oak, IA
- ●Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance
Birdstrike
What the record says
a pattern, not a findingacross the 8 closest cases · 8 carry coded findings · 8 have a probable cause- 8 of 8Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substancecited here too
- 8 of 8Birdstrike
- Physical environment › Object/animal/substance
- —
- —
A teaching device, not a verdict: what the record would have looked at, next to what the Board found.
- ENG14IA0052013-12-23 · BOEING 737 3H4 · SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO
The initial damage to the fan blades was caused by the ingestion of two mallard ducks that caused one or more fan blades to fracture, striking the fan shroud, as well as other passing fan blades, producing various sized blades fragments that created a cascading effect of collateral impact damage to the other fan blades, the fan case, and the inlet cowl. One large blade fragment was deflected out of the fan containment plane, which pierced and exited the inlet cowl in a benign direction. The engine and airplane m…
- WPR10LA0442009-11-02 · MCDONNELL DOUGLAS MD-90-30 · DELTA AIR LINES INC
An in-flight collision with birds.
- DCA24LA0512023-12-19 · BOEING 737 · SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO
A bird strike during climbout.
- DCA15CA0372014-12-13 · BOEING 737 · Southwest Airlines, Co.
an inadvertent encounter with birds during approach to land that resulted in substantial damage.
- CEN12IA5022012-07-31 · BOEING 737-924ER · UNITED AIR LINES INC
An in-flight collision with a bird during descent to land, which resulted in damage to the left pitot tube and loss of airspeed information to the left and right primary flight displays (PFD). The reason for the total loss of indications on the left PFD could not be determined based on available evidence.
This is the pattern in the NTSB’s own record across similar accidents — which findings it cited, what it coded, what it recommended. It is drawn from the record, not written about this case, and it never assigns blame: investigations exist to prevent the next accident (ICAO Annex 13).