FlarePath
Cases › DCA10IA001 › The analyst

AIRBUS A320NORTHWEST AIRLINES INC

What the docket says, assembled. No language model is involved, so nothing on this page can be invented — every line traces to a recorder, a report page or the Board's own record.

5
timed facts
8
precedents
24
passages to ask

Ask the docket

passages, not paraphrases
Try

Every answer is a passage of the docket with the page it came from, or the words “not in the docket”. Nothing is summarised or reasoned for you — read the source.

One timeline

5 timed factsthe recorder events from the FDR report, with the transcript's warnings, callouts, the words nearest each event and the final seconds — on one clock, as printed in each report
  1. 16:57:00 CDTFDRtakeoffp.4
    Start of plotted flight data (plots 1-4 cover 16:57:00 to 21:17:00 CDT)
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  2. 16:57:00-21:17:00 CDTFDRcruisep.2
    Plot 1 overlays one Denver ARTCC and one Minneapolis ARTCC transmission on the whole flight
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  3. 18:19:00-20:19:00 CDTFDRcruisep.5
    Cruise at 37,000 ft for a total of 1 hour 55 minutes (plots 5-8)
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  4. 18:56:55-20:12:44 CDTFDRcruisep.5
    Longest interval with no VHF keying: 1 hour 15 minutes 50 seconds between Key VHF transitions from Not Keyed to Keyed
    see the traces at this moment ↗
  5. 20:11:05-20:28:05 CDTFDRdescentp.2
    Plot 2 overlays six Minneapolis ARTCC transmissions on the 17-minute descent from 37,000 ft to 24,000 ft
    see the traces at this moment ↗
Recorder events without a clock time
  • after landingFDR powered off 12 min 40 s after landing; powered on at 21:54:51 CDT for 4 min 58 s; on at 23:05:24 CDT for 4 min 58 s; on at 02:03:25 CDT for 7 min 3 s; on at 03:29:52 CDT for 79 seconds until the recording ended
Flight Data Recorder 10 - Specialist's Factual Report · 4 events extracted by claude-fable-5-1 (in-session)Selected Air Route Traffic Control Center Transmissions Overlay Report (ATC/FDR overlay) · 2 events extracted by claude-fable-5-1 (in-session)
How the Board coded the sequence
  1. Enroute: Air traffic event

Precedents

8 closest casesranked by what happened, in the Board's words, and by the findings and occurrences it coded
  • ANC16FA0612016-08-315 fatalmatch 64
    CESSNA 208 · Hageland Aviation Services, Inc.
    Russian Mission, AK
    • ●Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring
  • CEN15IA3372015-08-05no fatalitiesmatch 63
    BOEING 737 · Southwest Airlines
    Denver, CO
    • ●Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring
  • DCA13CA0912013-05-09no fatalitiesmatch 60
    AIRBUS 320 · Delta Air Lines
    Dallas, TX
    • ●Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring
  • OPS10IA1962010-05-21no fatalitiesmatch 54
    AIRBUS INDUSTRIE A319-132 · USAirways Inc
    Anchorage, AK
    Air traffic event
  • OPS08IA0072008-07-03no fatalitiesmatch 52
    Boeing 737-700 · AirTrans
    Seattle, WA
    • ●Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring
  • OPS11IA4012011-03-23no fatalitiesmatch 49
    · FAA WASHINGTON FLIGHT PROGRAM
    Arlington, VA
    Air traffic event
  • ANC11FA0912011-09-021 fatalmatch 47
    CESSNA 208B · Grant Aviation
    Nightmute, AK
    • ●Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring
  • ERA09MA4472009-08-089 fatalmatch 47
    PIPER PA-32R-300 · STEVEN M ALTMAN
    Hoboken, NJ
    • ●Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring

What the record says

a pattern, not a findingacross the 8 closest cases · 8 carry coded findings · 8 have a probable cause
Findings the Board cited in those cases
Occurrences it coded
  • 3 of 8Midair collision
  • 2 of 8Air traffic event
Set against the Board’s own findings for this case
Cited here, and common in the precedents
  • Psychological › Attention/monitoring
Cited here, not seen in the precedents
  • —
Common in the precedents, not cited here
  • Task performance › Communication (personnel)

A teaching device, not a verdict: what the record would have looked at, next to what the Board found.

In the Board’s words — the closest cases
  • ANC16FA0612016-08-31 · CESSNA 208 · Hageland Aviation Services, Inc.
    The failure of both pilots to see and avoid each other while in level cruise flight, which resulted in a midair collision.
  • CEN15IA3372015-08-05 · BOEING 737 · Southwest Airlines
    The gate lead/pushback driver's failure to recognize that the provisioning truck was within the safety zone of the gate during his walkaround due to distractions, which resulted in the subsequent collision between the airplane and the truck. Contributing to the collision was the provisioning truck driver's failure to recognize he was parked in the safety zone of an active gate adjacent to his assigned gate, and the guide agent's improper assumption that the safety zone was properly cleared by the gate lead/pushback…
  • DCA13CA0912013-05-09 · AIRBUS 320 · Delta Air Lines
    The flight attendant's inadvertent trip over the jumpseat that had not retracted automatically.
  • OPS10IA1962010-05-21 · AIRBUS INDUSTRIE A319-132 · USAirways Inc
    The approach controller's delayed transfer of communications on the A319 to the tower controller and failure to account for the aircraft's speed when he directed the crew to turn north. Contributing to the incident was the 747 crew's transfer of radio communications to departure control prior to being directed to do so by the tower controller.
  • OPS08IA0072008-07-03 · Boeing 737-700 · AirTrans
    The diverted attention during taxi of the flight crew in the other aircraft. Contributing to the incident was the air traffic control clearance was not followed by the flight crew of the other aircraft.

This is the pattern in the NTSB’s own record across similar accidents — which findings it cited, what it coded, what it recommended. It is drawn from the record, not written about this case, and it never assigns blame: investigations exist to prevent the next accident (ICAO Annex 13).