FlarePath
Cases › CEN10LA363 › The analyst

EMBRAER EMB-145LRAMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES INC

What the docket says, assembled. No language model is involved, so nothing on this page can be invented — every line traces to a recorder, a report page or the Board's own record.

0
timed facts
8
precedents
10
passages to ask

Ask the docket

passages, not paraphrases
Try

Every answer is a passage of the docket with the page it came from, or the words “not in the docket”. Nothing is summarised or reasoned for you — read the source.

One timeline

0 timed factsthe recorder events from the FDR report, with the transcript's warnings, callouts, the words nearest each event and the final seconds — on one clock, as printed in each report

No timed facts: this docket has no extracted recorder sequence and no transcript.

Recorder events without a clock time
  • SRN 192,940-193,240Five-minute event window plotted (figures 1 and 2)
  • SRN 193,074Master warning on for 6 seconds
  • SRN 193,090Master caution on for 10 seconds
  • SRN 193,091-193,092Lowest vertical acceleration about -0.8 g at SRN 193,091, highest about 1.7 g at SRN 193,092
  • SRN 193,153Autopilot disengaged at about 36,750 ft pressure altitude
Flight Data Recorder 10 - Specialist's Factual Report · 5 events extracted by claude-fable-5-1 (in-session)
How the Board coded the sequence
  1. Enroute-cruise: Inflight upset→
  2. Enroute-cruise: Turbulence encounter

Precedents

8 closest casesranked by what happened, in the Board's words, and by the findings and occurrences it coded
  • ERA09LA4882009-08-27no fatalitiesmatch 84
    BOEING 717-200 · Airtran Airways
    Inverness, FL
    • ●Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence
    • ●Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel)
    • ●Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation
    Turbulence encounter
  • DCA12LA0912012-06-13no fatalitiesmatch 81
    BOEING 737-724 · UNITED AIR LINES INC
    Winnie, TX
    • ●Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence
    • ●Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel)
    Turbulence encounter
  • ERA09LA3962009-07-10no fatalitiesmatch 75
    AIRBUS A320-232 · JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP
    Fort Myers, FL
    • ●Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence
    • ●Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel)
    Turbulence encounter
  • DCA16CA0892016-02-14no fatalitiesmatch 74
    AIRBUS INDUSTRIE A319 132 · American Airlines
    Minneapolis, MN
    • ●Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence
    • ●Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel)
    Turbulence encounter
  • DCA23LA2522023-04-22no fatalitiesmatch 71
    BOEING 777-223 · AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
    Atlantic Ocean, AO
    • ●Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence
    Turbulence encounter
  • DCA16IA2152016-08-12no fatalitiesmatch 71
    AIRBUS A320 232 · JetBlue Airways
    Wood, SD
    • ●Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence
    Turbulence encounter
  • DCA24FA1432024-04-03no fatalitiesmatch 70
    BOEING 737-7CT · SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO
    Gulf of America, GM
    • ●Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence
    Turbulence encounter
  • DCA25LA1732025-03-27no fatalitiesmatch 70
    BOEING 787 · UNITED AIRLINES INC
    Claveria, OF
    • ●Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence
    Turbulence encounter

What the record says

a pattern, not a findingacross the 8 closest cases · 8 carry coded findings · 8 have a probable cause
Findings the Board cited in those cases
Occurrences it coded
  • 8 of 8Turbulence encounter
Set against the Board’s own findings for this case
Cited here, and common in the precedents
  • Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence
  • Task performance › Communication (personnel)
Cited here, not seen in the precedents
  • —
Common in the precedents, not cited here
  • —

A teaching device, not a verdict: what the record would have looked at, next to what the Board found.

In the Board’s words — the closest cases
  • ERA09LA4882009-08-27 · BOEING 717-200 · Airtran Airways
    The flight crew's encounter with convective turbulence. Contributing to the accident was the failure of the operator's dispatch department to provide the flightcrew with current adverse weather information along the planned route of flight. Also contributing was the failure of the flightcrew to provide relevant forecast information to the cabin crew, and their failure to detect and avoid the existing convective conditions.
  • DCA12LA0912012-06-13 · BOEING 737-724 · UNITED AIR LINES INC
    the flight crew's penetration of a rapidly developing thunderstorm cell in an area of forecasted convective activity. The serious injuries were the result of a misunderstanding between the captain and cabin crew regarding the potential for turbulence.
  • ERA09LA3962009-07-10 · AIRBUS A320-232 · JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP
    An inadvertent in-flight encounter with turbulence during approach. Contributing to the accident was the passengers' failure to follow the instructions of the illuminated seatbelt sign.
  • DCA16CA0892016-02-14 · AIRBUS INDUSTRIE A319 132 · American Airlines
    an encounter with turbulence that resulted in a serious injury to a passenger who was standing when the fasten seatbelt sign was illuminated.
  • DCA23LA2522023-04-22 · BOEING 777-223 · AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
    An encounter with inadvertent convective turbulence during cruise flight.

This is the pattern in the NTSB’s own record across similar accidents — which findings it cited, what it coded, what it recommended. It is drawn from the record, not written about this case, and it never assigns blame: investigations exist to prevent the next accident (ICAO Annex 13).