FlarePathAir-accident investigation intelligence
Investigation brief · generated 2026-10-09 · source: NTSB public docket and accident database

BOEING 757-222 — Denver, CO, USA, 2011-09-26

NTSB number
ENG11IA051
Operator
UNITED AIRlNES INC
Registration
N526UA
Highest injury
No injury
Regulation
Part 121
Damage
Minor
Cohort
Part 121 airline
Recorder data
Tier 1 — decoded recorder tables
Every sentence below is taken directly from NTSB records — the accident database, the docket's recorder reports and the Board's findings — with its source noted. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.

NTSB summary

On September 26, 2011, 1637 mountain daylight time, a Boeing B-757-222, registration number N526UA, operated by United Airlines (UAL) as flight 909, and powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW2037M turbofan engines, experienced a left engine (No. 1) bird strikeF following touchdown on runway 35R at the Denver International Airport (DEN), Denver, Colorado. According to the flightcrew, after initial touchdown and the application of full reverse thrust, two hawks were observed on the centerline of runway 35R and shortly thereafter impacts were felt on the fuselage. The airplane was towed to the gate using a tug where the passengers deplaned normally. The incident flight was a 14 CFR Part 121 domestic passenger flight from Chicago O’Hare Airport (ORD) to DEN. Examination of the airplane revealed only minor gouging of the fuselage while the No. 1 engine inlet cowl exhibited multiple impacts, gouges, and through-holes. Examination of the No. 1 engine revealed that all the fan blades were extensively damaged, three fractured transversely across the airfoil at or near the mid-span shroud, but no penetration or breaches were observed in any of the engine cases. The bird remains recovered within the No. 1 engine were identified as coming from a female Red-Tailed Hawk. An intact bird that struck the side of the No. 1 inlet was also identified as a Red-Tailed Hawk but was not sexed. Comparing the airplane and engine damage to the requirements for bird ingestion and engine debris containment at the time the engine and airplane were both certificated revealed that the engine complied with the bird ingestion and containment requirements set forth in Parts 33.77 and 33.19 and the airplane complied with the containment requirements set forth in Parts 25.903.
Verbatim, NTSB aviation accident database (narratives.narr_accf).

Probable cause

**This probable cause was modified on 4/5/2012. Please see the public docket for this accident to view the original probable cause.** The initial damage to the fan blades was caused by the ingestion of a Red-Tailed Hawk that caused one or more fan blades to fracture, striking the fan case and causing it to bulge. The initial fan blade fragment release impacted and damaged other passing fan blades generating various sized blades fragments. Some of these blade fragments were propelled forward of the fan case by passing fan blades and were reingested, creating a cascading effect of collateral impact damage to the other fan blades, the fan case, and the inlet cowl.
Verbatim, NTSB determination.

Sequence of events (FDR factual report)

TimeEventPage
1637:01Aircraft air/ground mode switched to ground3
1637:34Heading change from about 348 degrees to 319 degrees, occurring 33 seconds after air/ground switch to ground3
after 1638:13The airspeeds recorded after this time are not reliable3
shortly after thrust reverser deploymentA split in N1 and N23
coincident with thrust reverser deploymentIncrease in fuel flow, followed by number 1 engine fuel flow indicating zero along with a decrease in oil pressure3
during the landingThe left Shutoff Valve shows a change of state from open to closed3
Extracted by claude-sonnet-5; 0 of 1 stated events verified against the raw recorder data.

Recorder documents in the docket

GroupTitlePagesType
fdrFlight Data Recorder 10 - Specialist's Factual Report12pdf
fdrFlight Data Recorder 10 - Attachment 1 - Tabular Data - Flight - (CSV Format)zip

Docket: data.ntsb.gov/Docket/?NTSBNumber=ENG11IA051. This brief is an analytical aid assembled from public records; it is not an investigative finding.