FlarePathAir-accident investigation intelligence
Investigation brief · generated 2026-10-09 · source: NTSB public docket and accident database

AEROSPATIALE ALENIA ATR 42-320 — Lubbock, TX, USA, 2009-01-27

NTSB number
CEN09MA142
Operator
Empire Airlines
Registration
N902FX
Highest injury
Serious injury
Regulation
Part 121
Damage
Substantial
Cohort
Major investigation
Recorder data
Tier 1 — decoded recorder tables
Every sentence below is taken directly from NTSB records — the accident database, the docket's recorder reports and the Board's findings — with its source noted. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.

NTSB summary

The Safety Board’s full report is available at http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/A_Acc1.htm. The Aircraft Accident Report number is NTSB/AAR-11/02. On January 27, 2009, about 0437 central standard time, an Avions de Transport Régional Aerospatiale Alenia ATR 42 320, N902FX, operating as Empire Airlines flight 8284, was on an instrument approach when it crashed short of the runway at Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport, Lubbock, Texas. The captain sustained serious injuries, and the first officer sustained minor injuries. The airplane was substantially damaged. The airplane was registered to Federal Express Corporation and operated by Empire Airlines, Inc., as a 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 supplemental cargo flight. The flight departed from Fort Worth Alliance Airport, Fort Worth, Texas, about 0313. Instrument meteorological conditions prevailed, and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed.
Verbatim, NTSB aviation accident database (narratives.narr_accf).

Probable cause

The flight crew's failure to monitor and maintain a minimum safe airspeed while executing an instrument approach in icing conditions, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall at low altitude. Contributing to the accident were 1) the flight crew's failure to follow published standard operating procedures in response to a flap anomaly, 2) the captain's decision to continue with the unstabilized approach, 3) the flight crew's poor crew resource management, and 4) fatigue due to the time of day in which the accident occurred and a cumulative sleep debt, which likely impaired the captain's performance.
Verbatim, NTSB determination.

Flight data recorder

— 214,200 samples, 35 parameters, 03:11:50.7 to 04:36:50.7.

ParameterMaxatMinatFinalat
Pressure altitude ft17,988.003:45:45.8-3,589.004:36:33.8-3,497.004:36:49.8
Pitch attitude deg268.604:36:50.2-90.004:36:27.5265.804:36:50.5
Roll attitude deg161.404:36:36.5-175.404:36:27.5146.604:36:50.5
Vertical acceleration g5.904:36:27.10.404:36:25.51.004:36:50.6
Computed from the docket's tabular attachment; times as recorded (local or SRN as published).

Sequence of events (FDR factual report)

TimeEventPage
03:19 CSTDeparted Fort Worth Alliance, climbing to 18,000 ft; autopilot engaged at 03:23 through 4,700 ft; airframe de-ice on at 03:31 through 16,300 ft; level at 18,000 ft at 03:367
04:02-04:31 CSTDescent begun 04:02, level 13,900 ft at 04:08; descent 04:18, de-ice off through 10,000 ft at 04:22; level 5,800 ft at 04:27; descent 04:30 with de-ice selected on; level 4,800 ft at 04:317
04:33-04:34:20 CSTLeft turn onto the approach; localizer 0.0-0.5 dots, glideslope about -1.0 dot7
04:34:25-04:34:26 CSTFlap position began increasing from 0 deg; at about 4 deg a flap asymmetry was recorded and a left roll7
04:34:50-04:34:54 CSTDescent on the glideslope began (localizer 0.0, glideslope 1.0 dot); engine power reduced on both engines7
04:35:29-04:35:30 CSTAutopilot disengaged and power increased on both engines at 3,990 ft pressure altitude, 125 kts, AOA 11.3 deg; aircraft rolled to about 12 deg right then about 10 deg left7
04:35:50-04:35:58 CSTLocalizer -1.5 dots, glideslope 2.0 dots (above), radio altitude about 700 ft; momentary autopilot engage selections at 04:35:54 and 04:35:58; power reduced on both engines8
04:36:00-04:36:18 CSTGlideslope deviation approached 0.0 dots then increased; power increased on both engines at 04:36:18 at about 200 ft radio altitude8
04:36:20-04:36:27 CSTLoss of control: roll from 6 deg right varying between 35 deg right and 50 deg left; AOA from 13.6 deg varying -0.2 to 29.3 deg; pitch from 2 deg nose up varying between 11 deg nose up and 6 deg nose down (stall)8
04:36:27 CSTApproximate time of ground impact; airspeed, pressure altitude, pitch, roll and TAT/SAT unreliable thereafter8
Extracted by claude-fable-5-1 (in-session); 3 of 10 stated events verified against the raw recorder data.

Cockpit voice recorder

257 transcribed utterances from 04:10:52 to 04:37:27, 15 sources. Final entries:

04:37:16CAM-1no you know what—.
04:37:17CAM-2what.
04:37:17CAM-1when you get out can you get out—.
04:37:25CAM[sound similar to door opening]
04:37:27CAM-1*.
The NTSB cautions that a CVR transcript is not a precise science and should not be used as the sole source of information.

Recorder documents in the docket

GroupTitlePagesType
fdrFlight Data Recorder 10A - Specialist's Factual Report19pdf
fdrFlight Data Recorder 10B - Attachment 1 - Tabular Data -Entire Flight - (CSV Format)csv
fdrFlight Data Recorder 10C - Attachment 2 - Tabular Data - Last 15 Minutes (CSV Format)csv
cvrCockpit Voice Recorder 12 - Factual Report of Group Chairman26pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13 - Airplane Performance Study20pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13 - Airplane Performance Study Errata1pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13 - Airplane Performance Study Addendum 117pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13B - ATR Design Changes Since Roselawn18pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13C - ATR Aircraft Performance Monitoring System17pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13D - ATR Performance Analysis18pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13E - ATR Flap and Stall Warning Systems16pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13F - EASA Presentation on ATR-42 Certification9pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13G - FAA Presentation - Transport Category Certification10pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13H - FAA Presentation - ASIAS11pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13I - FAA Presentation - Proposed Icing Envelope12pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13J - FAA Presentation - National Simulator Program6pdf
performanceAircraft Performance 13K - FAA PAI Memo on Flap Asymmetry Indication7pdf
performanceReports from Parties to the Investigation: FAA response to the "No Action Memo" for the Airplane Performance Monitoring System3pdf

Docket: data.ntsb.gov/Docket/?NTSBNumber=CEN09MA142. This brief is an analytical aid assembled from public records; it is not an investigative finding.